Evaluation

My testers said that the project was good, but could be more interactive. I personally believe the project could improve if I had help making a more interactive script. The  video is about a genetic anomaly that is occurring in our own environment. It causes students to think that if something this strange is happening near them, what else do they not know about? This causes them to take interest and responsibility in their environment. The process of creating this project also effected me because it made come out of my shell and forced me to communicate with others. This really impacted me because what is the point of have a vast knowledge on something, if you cannot share it with world. I believe this will impact students enough for them to take interest in the environment locally or even globally.The product can be improved by making the script a little more interactive. I believe that I did well on the design, investigation, and creation portions of the design cycle. The investigation portion is done well because I did not only research the topic, but also how to create a well made script and storyboard. The design I believe was strong due to it completing all of the attributes stated in the design specification as well as executing them well. The creation was done well because I not only used class time well, but I used my own free time to work on this project and the result was a wonderfully crafted product. The plan was the weakest part of the design cycle due to the fact that I didn't know we had to plan, so my plan was more of a backtrack of what I accomplished. My actual timeline and my predicted one were the same. This is my project evaluation.